Will Rapportive change the Cambridge Cluster?

Image representing Rapportive as depicted in C...Image via CrunchBase

Great news that Rahul Vohra and his third venture, Rapportive, has gone viral with over 100,000 downloads.  Click here for the full story on Rapportive.  Briefly Rahul opted out of his PhD, helped start www.mo.jo, joined the start-ups at Redgate Software and toyed with a game based on a book and then came Rapportive.  Rahul left Cambridge to join Y Combinator and tap into the Silicon Valley scene.

Y Combinator invests an average of $17,000 in each start up – now over 280 companies – for around 10% of the equity.  Then Rapportive raised some $1 million from Silicon Valley angels.  I asked Rahul if he had given any of his early backers in Cambridge, UK, a chance to invest and he replied on Facebook “Rahul Vohra Philip: yup, there are investors from Cambridge. Neil Davidson, John Taysom, and one other who prefers to remain anonymous :)”.

Redgate appears to have a policy to go for growth and show that you can build a major technology company without offering equity to employees except a tightly controlled scheme.  If founder Neil Davidson sees Rahul grow fast, will this change his view?  Particularly if he sees them then grow new companies with their “winnings”.  As Redgate plays a major part in the Cambridge Cluster, including providing the chair of Cambridge Network, this could have a major impact on the Cambridge Cluster.

Silicon Valley keeps ringing the changes.  First companies were sold that made a profit, then the social network companies were sold which made no profits but had millions of users and now people are buying teams of geeks.  An example is Motorola buying 280 North for the geek team.  Up 280 is another success from the Y Combinator stable.  Up 280 raised less than Rapportive with a reported $250,000 in a 2008 angel round.  Interesting to try to guess at the final equity ownership.  The Equity Fingerprint was: two founders, then Y Combinator, an angel round and hopefully options for the team.

Guesstimates:

Round 1: Start -up:

Two founders – 50% each;

Round 2: Y Combinator arrives:

Two founders – 45% each, Y Combinator 10%

Rounds 3: Angels invest $250,000 and say 10% option pool:

Round 4: Two founders –  22.5% each, Y Combinator 5%, angels 40% and 10% option pool.

Guess that Y Combinator and angels would be paid out on completion with the founders and option pool vesting over a couple of years.  But a great deal for the geeks.  Congratulations.  Not as good as Xensource in Cambridge, UK, but not bad!

The world keeps spinning; will Rapportive make the Cambridge Cluster spin faster?  Will Rahul return to Cambridge with his winnings and tell us all about his business plan resource, become an angel and a serial entrepreneur?  How long will we have to wait?  The clock is ticking……..

Enhanced by Zemanta

A valet for my car and a valet for the garage!

An honour for me to be to be asked to drive three bridesmaid to church for Flick’s wedding.  I used to drive the girls around to horse events all those years ago and now they have grown up and are settling down – well , most of them – and Flick wants me to drive them one last time.  So off to the local Cambridge garage where a wonderful Polish man valets a car ready for a princess or bridesmaid.

Took my lunch and the Daily Telegraph along to pass the time and got talking to the owner who had offered me a cup of tea.  He was not too keen to be named but the story he told was that he had set out to become a solicitor with his brother taking over the family garage business.  Sadly his brother did not survive a kidney transplant so my new found friend gave up the law and took over the family business.  He moved it to a new site, ditched the franchises when the main car companies started to run the franchises in great detail to the extent of even interviewing the cleaners.  You put up the money and we will tell you how to run your business.!  Margins were good and all was well.

Then the Internet started to influence the business about six years ago.  Instead of having local customers, he is now a “national” car dealer with an on-line presence on Auto Trader.   Glasses Guide which used to be the “bible” of second hand car prices is no longer necessary and Exchange and Mart has lost market share.  All the prices are on Auto Trader.  People want to see before they buy but now they all arrive with the details all printed out and especially with details of a similar car at a lower price somewhere in the UK.  When times were tough, stock of cars were cut back from 100 to 25 by making sure each unwanted car was the best buy on Auto Trader for its type.

But all is not so gloomy because new opportunities have opened up such as breaking cars on and selling the parts on eBay.  Just got to pack the goods carefully so no arguments with the carriers over damages.  Difficult to argue and win with a carrier!

Also the rescue fleet is all monitored from the iPhone or iPad so whilst the mechanic is out on a dark and stormy night rescuing some unlucky motorist, the fleet can be monitored from the comfort of the owner’s home.

Sad that there is no indication on the outside of the garage that it has moved with the times and has now become an iGarage.  It is a family owned business so no need for a business plan resource.

So a valet for my car and a valet for the garage!

Tough times but no time to waste in the fight against cancer

Not quite sure what this has to do with the Cambridge Cluster except that some people in the Cambridge Cluster are working hard to develop ways of beating cancer.  Three bits of tough news.

The first is a friend of nearly forty years who has been complaining of aching bones for some months.  Such a strong looking and fit man could not be ill; just a strain to go away.  But it is prostate cancer which has spread to his bones as is it’s wont.  So he has retired and gone on a holiday.  Let us hope that something can be done to extend his life.

Second is a person I phoned on Monday.  Usually full of life, his response was “dull”.  Immediately I asked what was wrong and he was rather taken aback.  A few months ago I had helped sponsor a Three Peaks Challenge to raise funds for research into bowel cancer.  All had gone well with the walk and fund-raising but it had now struck too close to home.  His wife has now been diagnosed with bowel cancer.  Again let us hope and pray for some treatment and many more years of life.  It is not fair; it never is.

Third is the lovely young lady (well, to an old man!) working in the gardens of a pub.  I was being treated to lunch and we struck up a conversation.  Times were tough because her husband and three friends had invested in a company which had gone bust and the bank was looking at the personal guarantees.  Someone had bought the business from the receiver and now the previous owners were working for the new owner.  Ouch! It must hurt, every day.

So hoping for some good news and looking forward to visiting Cornwall soon.  So glad that the Camerons’ fourth child has been born today in hospital in Cornwall.  Let us hope that more people enjoy a “staycation” with the same happy ending.

So all this means that a business plan resource has not been at the top of my priorities but tomorrow I am meeting the wonderful Yen from Malaysia.  She was a great supporter of CU Entrepreneurs and is interested in Equity Fingerprint and the Yomp.  Let us hope someone soon will make a breakthrough to help all dealing with cancer.

Bottom feeding at the auctions to see dreams shattered!

Yvonne loves to go to the auctions and I go along.  Learning so much not only about the amount of junk so many of us hord but also all about people.  I am not a great fan of the Apprentice and the dreaded “Lord Sugar” – not sure he could run any Cambridge Cluster company – but the TV series does have a very important point about buying and selling.  It is so easy to sit back in an auction and buy but it takes a very different mindset to rise early on a Sunday morning and queue for the honour of having a stand at the Newbury car boot sale.  The skill is of buying in the auction for the customers at the car boot sale and not buying for your taste – not that it is better but it may well be different. It takes effort and concentration.

You see it so often in Cambridge Cluster companies (and we have done the same with the graphic novel The Entrepreneurs) that it is much easier to look inwards to build the product and a very different skill (and very difficult to do simultaneously) to intereact with customers and investors.  The latter takes effort and energy and usually travelling.

The other lesson we can all learn is to build a business lean and not mean.  But what about the entrepreneur who bought two pictures from the Wellington Gallery in Birmingham for a total of £10,000.  They were knocked down at the auction for a little more than 10% of their cost.  Stay lean and buy the luxuries from the proceeds of the sale of your business.  When items are entered for auction by the agents of Liquidators or the High Sheriff there is usually no reserve so a good time to try a low bid.

But it is very sad to see dreams shattered and not to think for too long about all the human tragedy behind some of the sales.  At least the entrepreneurs can start again but some auctions reflect the unhappy lives people have lived leaving behind a house to be cleared by agents and not loving relatives.

How I love people watching at the auctions.  The highest bidders are often the least well dressed.  The auctions are being changed by the Internet with a representative of The Sale Room sitting at the front.  Often the auctioneer gets frustrated by some of the Internet bidders being slow and brings down the hammer.  But if serious money is being offered the auctioneer has plenty of time!

The auctions we have attended are Jubilee Auctions in Pewsey, Mays Auctioneers of Shipton Bellinger, Stroud Auctions, Thimbleby & Shorland of Reading (sometimes five simultaneous auctions!), Wessex Auctions.  And closer to home is Cheffins Auctions with their very knowledgeable team including George Archdale and Sarah Flynn.

To buy or not to buy is easy; to sell, how and to whom is the question!  Something we all face in the Cambridge Cluster.

The joys of the viral Scobleizer hype!

Wish I had an iPad and was understanding the hype around Flipboard.  Even Scobleizer‘s wife is being kept waiting so guess that keeps Robert on the road!  Great to have an app so wanted that you have to limit the uptake to stop your servers crashing.  Hope we have the same problems with our graphic novel, The Entrepreneurs, for the future Thought Leadership.

Thought Leadership moves to Silicon Valley from Boston

Great article of an interview with Greylock’s Henry McCance on why they are moving their HQ to Silicon Valley.  And so many lessons for the Cambridge Cluster.  It is sad and depressing that some of the so called movers and shakers of the Cambridge Cluster do not think that spin-outs of companies are important to building a cluster.  It is essential to keep the Thought Leadership motivated and generating the next generation of companies and technologies.

One interesting comment is McCance makes is ““At the margin, there are small things that can be done to make the climate more attractive for startups. An example is to change the non-compete laws that are much more restrictive and enforceable in MA than in CA. ‘Hot’ engineers don’t want to worry about ending up in lawsuits and court if they leave one company to start or join a new company.”  Guess it was a shame(!) that we linked with MIT and not Silicon Valley.

Also depressing in Cambridge that great successes such as Xensource are funded outside the Cambridge Cluster and then the success hushed up in case anyone on the fringes is unhappy.  I guess that this is Britain and no one likes to see a winner especially when they are public sector employees of Cambridge University.  Where else would a great success such as Xensource be hushed under the carpet?  Are there other Xensource type successes of which we have never heard?  Time to get out the business plan resource and start building great companies in the Cambridge Cluster.

Good service from Ten after a rocky start

Interesting case study on the life so far of Ten Lifestyle Management.  For £300 per month, Ten – intelligent support – helps it’s 450,000 with anything they wish that is legal.  Founded by Alex Cheatle and Andrew Long in 1998 and funded by angels, they let costs run out of control.  In 2003, TLM went into Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) and costs, mainly staff salaries, were slashed.  Headcount was cut from 100 to 33 and all employees earning more than £30,000 (that is per year for any footballer reading this) took a 20% pay cut.

Last year the company had revenues of £12million and a pre-tax profit of £400,ooo and hopefully growing to sales of £17million this year.  TLM is now debt free and cash positive.

Turning to equity, Cheatle owns 20%, 11 members of the management 10% and over 100 angels (private investors) the balance of 70%.  I wonder if these angels are the same as the original angels and, if so, did they have to invest more cash?  Why are co-founders Cheatle and Long not equal shareholders?  Did one put lots of cash up, leave his secure job first or have the idea? Interesting to see if they used the Equity Wheel and a business plan resource.

Already they are finding it difficult to scale this business – they have done incredibly well so far; but we are just trying to learn – but are unlikely to need to raise more equity.

After a rocky start a nice little earner but when and how will the angels get their money back?  Will the company have to be sold or floated soon?  And always the problem of investing in a business that does not scale but, when on the right tracks, no need for more money.  Even with more investment, they are going to find it very difficult to grow.

Just amazing that 450,000 people are so busy they need their services.  It reminds me of asking the wonderful drivers of Camtax in the 1980s to take the kids and au pair to the supermarket.  Such guilt!!

Two different ways to sweeten the investor

Loss making Ocado (formed by three former Goldman Sachs bankers in January 2000) is planning to share it’s IPO with customers; they will be given the chance to invest.  The £1billion flotation is expected next month (July 2010).  It takes a GS banker or three to make a profit for shareholders from a company running a £32.6million pre-tax loss last year.  Guess the GS guys really understand their business plan resource and like many VC funded technology start-ups have built a brand with value.  Unlike a technology business, it is going to be difficult to scale Ocado into a global business.  So much easier to send 0s and 1s down the global Internet.  But at least the investors are being given a chance to invest in the equity.

Cambridge Cluster company, Hotel Chocolat, have a different deliverable – loan us your money and get dividends of chocolates via the their Tasting Club.  Will the Inland Revenue want a taster of “income”?  No sweet equity here and no sweat equity for the 600 people who have helped build the wonderful business of Hotel Chocolat.  Interesting to read that co-founder Angus Thirlwell’s father founded Mr Whippy and Prontaprint.  Does bean counter and co-founder Peter Harris have similar pedigree?

Two great companies, but both with problems with scaling their businesses globally.  But still I am sure that Andrew and Peter never regret leaving the technology world after meeting at Torch Computers in the early ’80s.  Those were the days.  How did we build and sell Baddeley Associates in five years after Torch showed great faith in us by becoming our first customer?  You never, never, ever forget your first customer – the people not the company.

Hat tip:  Daily Telegraph business section 8 June 2010.

CUTEC Conference

Make sure you do not miss this fantastic conference.  Follow on Twitter #tvc2010

Break outs so important

Some people think that break outs from companies – people with cash from options/shares and the experience of working in a start-up – are not important.Guess this post on TechCrunch says it all – Yelp is “another company founded in 2004 by two former PayPal employees…..”.Guess we need to include some history of the founders – adding in both cash and experience of a start-up to show how the initial valuation is increased to reduce dilution in the first round – in the business plan resource.

Yelp

 

Yelp image

Website: yelp.com
Location: San Francisco, California, United States
Founded: July 1, 2004
Funding: $56M

Another company founded in 2004 by two former PayPal employees, Yelp is a local reviews website covering almost 40 states. Yelp also launched in the UK in January 2009. Users write and read reviews about… Learn More